The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the appellant. The court recorded the withdrawal memo and ordered refund of court fee. The underlying suit was for recovery of money.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; court fee to be refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
RFA NO.34 OF 2017 (MON)
BETWEEN :
M/S SRI. RAGHAVENDRA CONCRETE PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.1600 NAGAPPA BLOCK, BENGALURU – 560 021 REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR (FINANCE) SRI. NARASIMHAN R. S/O RAJAGOPAL K. N. AGED 37 YEARS M/S SRI RAGHAVENDRA CONCRETE PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. NO.24, A & B KUMBALGOD, INDUSTRIAL AREA 1ST PHASE, BENGALURU – 560 074 … APPELLANT
(BY SRI. N. T. PREMNATH, ADVOCATE)
AND :
STATE BANK OF MYSORE GAYATHRI NAGAR BRANCH 3363-3364, 1ST MAIN ROAD GAYATHRINAGAR BANGALORE – 560 021 BY ITS MANAGER SRI. G. K. VISHWANATH … RESPONDENT (BY SRI.VARADARAJ R. HAVALDAR, ADVOCATE)
2
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 24.09.2016 PASSED IN OS NO.2878/1990 ON THE FILE OF THE XV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY (CCH NO.3), DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.
THIS RFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a
memo dated 09.07.2021 to withdraw the appeal.
Memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Office to verify and refund the Court fee to the
appellant in accordance with law.
Sd/JUDGE
MH/-
M/S Sri. Raghavendra Concrete Products Pvt. Ltd.
State Bank of Mysore Gayathri Nagar Branch
M.I. Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
