This court disposed of an appeal against a partition decree by dismissing the appeal as withdrawn by the appellant upon the filing of a withdrawal memo.
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The pending interim application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
RFA NO.117 OF 2013 (PAR)
BETWEEN :
SMT. SHARADHAMMA W/O SRI. MUNIYAPPA D/O MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/AT DODDABELAKERE VILLAGE SHIVAKOTE POST – 560 089 BANGALORE NORTH TALUK … APPELLANT
(BY SRI H.V.SUBRAMANYA, ADV.)
AND :
2
3
R-9 SERVED; R-10 SERVED; SRI. H.S.KIRAN KUMAR, ADV. FOR R-12; VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 28.05.2021 APPEAL AGAINST R-11 IS DISMISSED)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.08.2012 PASSED IN O.S.NO.27406/2009 ON THE FILE OF 26TH ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION.
THIS RFA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 15.07.2021 seeking to withdraw the
appeal.
The memo is placed on record. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending I.A. does not survive and it stands
disposed of accordingly.
Sd/JUDGE
hkh.
SMT. SHARADHAMMA
SMT. MUNIYAMMA
SRI. RAJANNA
SRI. SRINIVAS
SRI. RAVI
SMT. JAYAMMA
M.I. ARUN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
