Criminal Appeal filed against orders in a case involving offences under SC/ST Act and IPC. The court dismissed the appeal on the submission that it was withdrawn by the appellant.
Criminal Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
CRIMINAL APPEAL No.758 OF 2021
BETWEEN
Sri C.T.Raju @ Kokkada Raju, S/o Late G.Thomas, Aged about 54 years, R/at Kuntalpalke House, Hathyadka Village, Arasinamakki, Belthangady Taluk-574214.
…Appellant
(By Smt. Haleema Ameen, Advocate)
AND
2
Belthangady Taluk, D.K.-574214.
…Respondents
(By Sri P.Thejesh, HCGP, for R1)
This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. praying to Cr.No.20/2021 of Dharmasthala P.S., D.K., for the offence punishable under Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(v), 3(2)(v-a) of SC/ST Act and Sections 504, 506, 326 read with 34 of IPC. This Criminal Appeal coming on for orders this day, the court made the following:
ORDER
Counsel for the appellant submits that this
appeal be dismissed as withdrawn.
Submission is placed on record. Appeal is accordingly dismissed.
SD/JUDGE
ckl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Appeal filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. should be allowed or dismissed.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
C.T.Raju @ Kokkada Raju
State through Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bantwala
Smt. Sundari
SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
