The writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous upon submission of a memo by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Writ petition dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
WRIT PETITION NO.866 OF 2020 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.CYRIL PRASAD PAIS, ADVOCATE)
AND:
MR.JOSEPH MIRANDA S/O. LATE JULIANA MIRANDA R/AT MIRABELLA HOUSE LOWER BENDORE, 3RD CROSS ROAD MANGALORE – 575 002. ... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.S.RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR CAVATOR/RESPONDENT)
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD:13.12.2019 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE, MANGALORE BY JMFC DAKSHINA KANNADA IN O.S. NO.565/2011 ON I.A. NO.16 FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 14 R/W SECTION 151 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE-A CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS NUMBERED AS I.A. NO.16 FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 14 R/W SECTION 151 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri.Cyril Prasah Pais, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri.S.Rajashekar, learned counsel for caveator – respondent are present before the Court.
3
for petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
VMB
Rev. Fr. Aloysius Menezes and Frederick Menezes
Mr. Joseph Miranda
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
