The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 as infructuous after the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The court reduced costs payable by the petitioner from Rs.5,000 to Rs.2,000.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; costs reduced to Rs.2,000/- payable by petitioner to respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
WRIT PETITION NO.22397 OF 2019 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
MR.VIVEK DEVESHWAR AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS AW2, FERN SAROJ 7TH CROSS, L.B.SHASTRI NAGAR BANGALORE – 560 017.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI.H.MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
MRS.ANUBHA DEVESHWAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/O.BG-1, NO.22 MILLENNIUM RESIDENCY K.G.COLONY, G.M.PALYA BANGALORE – 560 075.
PRESENTLY R/A: FLAT NO.B-1, HOMETECH SOUNDARYA 9TH ‘B’ MAIN, 7TH ‘A’ CROSS L.B.SHASTRI NAGAR BANGALORE – 560 017.
... RESPONDENT
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.04.2019 IN MISC NO.14/2019 BY THE PRINCIPAL FAMILY COURT JUDGE AT BANGALORE I.E., ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard Sri.H.Manjunath, learned counsel for the
petitioner, in person.
prayed that the same may be reduced to Rs.2,000/-.
3
for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Petitioner is hereby directed to pay cost of Rs.2,000/-, instead of Rs.5,000/-, to the respondent in O.S.No.22/2015.
Sd/JUDGE
VMB
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as infructuous upon memorandum seeking withdrawal and waiver of costs.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. Vivek Deveshwar
Mrs. Anubha Deveshwar
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
