Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking reference for amicable settlement. Court dismissed petition as withdrawn based on post-filing communication from counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
WRIT PETITION NO.35640 OF 2019 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
Mr.Ashok Lobo S/o. late Mr.Lawrence Raymond Lobo Aged about 55 years R/a No.12, 1st Cross Road Vinayaka Layout Bhoopasandra Bengaluru – 560 094. ... Petitioner
(By Sri.Dilraj.Jude Rohit Sequeira, Advocate)
AND:
2
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution Of India, praying to direct the Trial Court to refer the case between the petitioner and R-1 pending on the Hon’ble XXVIII Additional and Senior City Civil Judge Mayo Hall, Bangalore in Ex.P.No.25323/2018 produced at Annexure-A for exploring the possibility of amicable settlement and withdrawal of the case pending between the parties.
This Writ Petition coming on for preliminary hearing this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for petitioner has sent a
Memo through E-mail stating that the writ petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.
3
The Memo is taken on record. Perused the contents
of the Memo.
In view of the Memo, writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
bkp
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mr.Ashok Lobo S/o. late Mr.Lawrence Raymond Lobo
Mr.Rama Bhupal Reddy S/o. Mr.Rami Reddy
M/s.Maxwell Zeus Expositions (P) Ltd.
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
