Petitioner moved the High Court of Karnataka by writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking quashing of an order. During preliminary hearing, counsel filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition, and the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
WRIT PETITION No.67572/2011 (EXCISE)
BETWEEN:
SMT.SHARADA W/O. LATE SHAM SHETTY AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. FORT ROAD, NEAR REGAL CIRCLE, DHARWAD.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SADIQ N. GOODWALA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
2
BY ITS MUTAWALLI S. A. KHATIB
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. V. S. KALASURMATH, HCGP FOR R1 TO R4; V/O. DATED 17.11.2011 – R5 DELETED)
THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD: 17-11-2011 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN NO:EXE:DWD:CL-9:32:2011-12 VIDE ANNEXURE-D.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B-GROUP’ THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a
memo seeking withdrawal of the writ petition.
Memo is placed on record.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
gab
SMT.SHARADA W/O. LATE SHAM SHETTY
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, NAVANAGAR, HUBLI
JYOTI MULIMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
