The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition filed by a bank replying to a legal notice regarding excess interest with consent withdrawn by the petitioner before hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 17T H DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
WRIT PETITION NO.61709/2010 (CS- RES)
BETWEEN:
HALAKUSUGAL VYAVASAYA SEVA SAHAKAR BANK LTD., HALAKUSUGAL TQ: NAVALAGUND, DIST : DHARWAD REP. BY ITS MANAGER SRI MADIVALAYYA S/O. PATADAYYA CHIKKAMATH, AGE : 58 YEARS.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI MADANMOHAN M. KHANNUR, ADVOCATE.)
AND:
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI V.S.KALASURMATH, HCGP, FOR R.1; SRI SUNIL S. DESAI, ADVOCATE, FOR R.2 TO R.4.)
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO:
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING B-GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner files a
memo seeking withdrawal of the writ petition. The memo is taken on record. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
JUDGE
Mrk/-
SD/-
Halakusugal Vyavasaya Seva Sahakar Bank Ltd. Rep. by its Manager Sri Madivalayya S/o. Patadayya Chikkamath
The State of Karnataka Rep. by its Secretary Department of Co-operation
The Managing Director KCC Bank Ltd., Dharwad
The Branch Manager KCC Bank Ltd., Dharwad
The Deputy Director Audit (Rule 441), KCC Bank, Dharwad
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
