Disposed
Mr M J Siwani v. Mrs Pramila
Karnataka HCWP/44362/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF JUNE, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
WRIT PETITION NO.44362/2018 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
MR.M.J.SIWANI AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS S/O. MR.J.K.SIWANI RESIDING AT NO.14 CUNNINGHAM ROAD BENGALURU – 560 052. ... PETITIONER
(BY SRI.VIVEK.B.N., ADVOCATE, FOR SRI.ABHINAV.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS D/O.LATE.PAPAIAH REDDY BORE WELL ROAD, WHITEFIELD K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK – 560 057.
2
3
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD:30.07.2018 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGLORE IN O.S. NO.1351/2008 VIDE ANNX-B AND ALLOW I.A. NO.4, THEREBY GRANTING PERMISSION TO THE PETITIONER TO PARTICIPATE AND CONTEXT THE SAID SUIT AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard Sri.Vivek B.N., learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri.Abhinav.R, learned counsel for petitioner through video conferencing.
4
In view of the dismissal of the suit, writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
VMB
Mr. M. J. Siwani
Mrs. Pramila
Mrs. Kantamma
Mrs. Chinnamma
Mr. Rama Reddy
Mr. P. Venkatesh
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court