Court dismissed the writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India as withdrawn by the counsel for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT
WRIT PETITION NO.105361/2019 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN
MANOHAR S/O YALLAPPA PATIL @ MOHAN S/O YALLAPPA PATIL, AS SHOWN IN PLAINT, AGE 75 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED, R/O: YALLAPUR, TQ: YALLAPUR, DIST: KARWAR.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI.P N HOSAMANE, ADVOCATE)
AND
2
3
OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: SADHANA FOOTWEAR, BUS STOP, NEAR POST OFFICE, TIPATUR, DIST: TUMAKURU.
| 12. | MEENAKSHI W/O BHARAMAREDDY DODDAMANI AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHLD WORK, R/O: NEAR OLD BUS STAND, RAMADURGA, DIST: BELAGAVI. |
|---|---|
| 13. | MAHADEVI W/O FAKEERAPPA KALE AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: NEAR ISLAM HIGH SCHOOL, TELUGU COLONY, HOUSE NIO.12, CAMP, BELAGAVI. |
| 14. | JAYASHREE W/O SHYAM NIPPANIKAR AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: SHAH ARCADE, PLOT NO.2, NEAR BAJI MARKET KALAPUR, PANAJI, GOA. |
| 15. | PRABHAVATI W/O NAGENDRA GARAG AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: UNIVERSITY QUARTERS NO:F/17, DHARWAD. |
| 16. | ANAND S/O MARISWAMI KATTIMANI AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: JE TELEPHONE, BSNL OLD HUBBALLI, HUBBALLI. |
| 17. | PRAKASH S/O BHIMASEN KATTIMANI (SAMAGAR) AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: POSTMAN, R/O: HOUSE NO:75/4, GOKAK FALLS, DIST: BELAGAVI. |
| 18. | SUVARNA W/O ASHOK KITTUR AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: KALMATHGALLI GUDDAKATTI HOUSE, |
4
BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI.
... RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 09.01.2019 PASSED BY ADDITIONAL CIIVL JUDGE AND JMFC BAGALKOT ON I.A.NO. AND O.S.NO.83/2014 AS PER ANNEXURE-E TO THE WRIT PETITION.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
5
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and prays for dismissal of the writ petition.
The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
Sh
MANOHAR S/O YALLAPPA PATIL @ MOHAN S/O YALLAPPA PATIL
KALLAPPA S/O SHIVAPPA KATTIMANI (SAMAGAR)
SAROJA W/O VENKANNA SOUDATI
KAVITA D/O PARSHURAM SOUDATTI
MADHU S/O PARSHURAM SOUDATTI
NIRMALA W/O ASHOK BIDIKAR
S.G. PANDIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
