Petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution filed to quash certain order were dismissed as withdrawn following a memo stating they would not survive for consideration due to subsequent developments.
The writ petitions were dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 27th DAY OF JANUARY, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT
WRIT PETITION NO.108266/2016 (GM-CPC) WRIT PETITION NO.108285/2016
BETWEEN:
VIJAYALAXMI W/O DAMODHAR BADIGER AGE:31 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O NEELGUND VILLAGE, TQ:BAGALKOTE, DIST:BAGALKOT.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. JAGADISH PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND
DAMODHAR S/O KALINGARAO BADIGER AGE:36 YEARS, OCC:PRIVATE SERVICE, R/O VIDYAGIRI, TQ & DIST:BAGALKOT.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SRINIVAS B NAIK, ADVOCATE)
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 16.09.2016 IN MC NO.49/2015 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, BAGALKOT VIDE ANNEXUER-E FURTHER IT PRAYED TO PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO CROSS-EXAMINE PW1, BY ALLOWING IA NO.1 AND II DATED 26.09.2016 FILED BY PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-D & D1.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
2
ORDER
Memo dated 23.1.2020 is filed stating that in view of subsequent developments, writ petitions would not survive for consideration.
Memo is placed on record. The writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
JTR
Vijayalaxmi W/o Damodhar Badiger
Damodhar S/o Kalingarao Badiger
S.G. Pandit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
