High Court of Karnataka dismissed W.P.Nos.67624-625 of 2010 as infructuous after respondents submitted a memo stating subsequent developments rendered the petitions unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT
W.P.Nos.67624-625 OF 2010 (GM-WAKF)
BETWEEN:
... PETITIONERS
(By Sri. : DINESH M KULKARNI, ADVOCATE)
AND
2
3
KARADGI, TALUK :SAVANUR, DIST: HAVERI
(By Sri : AHMED ALI RAHIMAN SHAH & SRI.SADIQ M GOODWALA, ADVS. FOR R1, SRI. M M MALAGI FOR R2 & R3 SRI.R.K.HATTI, ADV. FOR R4 TO R9, R11, R13 TO 18 R1 SERVED, R12 NOTICE HELD SUFFICIENT)
... RESPONDENTS
4
THESE WPs ARE FILED UNDER ARITCLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED: 02-03-2009/18-05-2009 VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND ORDER DATED:07-08-2010, PASSED BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER, KARNATAKA WAKF TRIBUNAL, BELGAUM, VIDE ANNEXURE-C AS NULL AND VOID.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for respondent No.1 files a memo
dated 13.01.2020 stating that in view of subsequent developments, the writ petitions have become infructuous.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would not dispute the same. Hence, the writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
mpk/-*
SRI. ABDUL KHADAR S/O.MAHAMMADGOUSE ATTIGERI
SRI. ABDUL NABI S/O. DASTGIRSAB MATTESABANAVAR
THE KARNATAKA WAKF BOARD
S.G. PANDIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
