The Karnataka High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, as the petitioner filed a memo withdrawing the petition, stating it did not survive due to subsequent developments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 11th DAY OF JANUARY 2019
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BELLUNKE A.S.
WRIT PETITION No.104904 of 2018(EDN )
BETWEEN:
VINAYKUMAR S/O SURESH VARADA AGE: 21, OCC: STUDENT, R/O: SIDDESHWAR NAGAR, 3RD CROSS, RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI. (BY SRI. G.K. HIREGOUDAR, ADV.)
…PETITIONER
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI R.M. KULKARNI, ADV. FOR R2. R1 SERVED)
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED:03.08.2018 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-"E" AND CONSEQUENTLY CONSIDER THE PETITIONER CANDIDATURE UNDER THE TELUGU LINGUISTIC MINORITY CATEGORY IN THE MOPUP COUNSELING SCHEDULED TO BE CONDUCTED ON 13.08.2018.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, NAGARATHNA J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a
memo stating that in view of the subsequent developments, writ petition does not survive for consideration.
Memo is taken on record.
Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
Kmv
Vinay Kumar
Karnataka Examinations Authority
B.V. Nagarathna
Bellunke A.S.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
