The High Court at Bengaluru disposed of two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a sale proclamation. The court accepted the withdrawal of the petitions and dismissed the same.
Petitions dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2016
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
WRIT PETITION Nos.28815-28816 OF 2015 (CS-RES)
BETWEEN:
Petitioners 1 and 2 are minors, And are represented by their Mother, natural guardian and Next friend Smt. Masarath Asad,
Both are residing at No.1022/47, 38th Cross, 4th ‘T’ Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore 560 011.
…PETITIONERS
(By Shri P. Anand, Advocate)
2
AND:
3
(By Smt. Pramodhini Kishan, Government Pleader for respondent Nos. 1 and 2)
These Writ Petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the sale proclamation dated 6.7.2015 issued by the second respondent vide Annexure-J.
These Writ Petitions coming on for orders, this day, the court made the following:
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking to withdraw the petitions.
The memo is taken on record and the petitions are
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
KS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohammed Numaan Asad and Mohammed Salman Asad (represented by Smt. Masarath Asad)
The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies and Amanath Co-operative Bank Limited
Mohammed Asadulla
Smt. Rizwana Begum
Anand Byrappa
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
