The court dismissed the criminal petition as the petitioner withdrew it. A connected interim application was disposed of as a consequence. The order is a mere administrative disposition without substantive legal discussion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2016
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION No.4215 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
M.T.Krishnappa, Son of Late M. Thimmaiah, Aged about 61 years, Member of Legislative Assembly, Residing at Muthsandra Village, Myasandra Hobli, Turuvekere Taluk, Tumkur District – 572 102.
…PETITIONER
(By Shri B.K.Manjunath, Advocate)
AND:
State by Turuvekere Police, Represented by its State Public Prosecutor, High Court Building, Bangalore – 560 001.
…RESPONDENT
2
(By Shri Chetan Desai, Government Pleader)
This Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to set aside the order passed by the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiptur on I.A. filed under Section 216 of Cr.PC in S.C.No.48/2014 dated 26.4.2016 and direct the learned Sessions Judge to frame additional charges for the offence punishable under Section 395 of IPC.
This Criminal Petition coming on for Admission this day, the court made the following:
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw
the petition as not pressed.
Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the
petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
I.A.1/2016 is disposed of as a consequence.
Sd/- JUDGE
KS
M.T.Krishnappa
State
Anand Byrareddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
