Criminal Appeal filed by HDFC Limited praying to set aside the acquittal of the respondent under Section 138 N.I. Act. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the appellant.
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2016
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
CRIMINAL APPEAL No.73 OF 2016
BETWEEN: Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited, HDFC House, No.51, Kasturba Road, Bangalore – 560 001. Represented by its Authorized representative P.A.Holder, Mr. Manoj J. Shah, Aged about 51 years. …APPELLANT (By Shri B.S.Mahendra, Advocate )
AND:
Mr. H. Rajappa, Major in age, S.J.M.Badavane, Bharmasagara, Chitradurga District 577 519. And also at:
2
Government Higher Primary School, Bevinahally, Chitradurga District – 577 519.
…RESPONDENT
This Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378(4) of the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the advocate for the appellant praying to set aside the judgment dated 4.11.2015 passed by the XXI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore in C.C.No.17497/2011 – acquitting the respondent/accused for the offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I.Act.
This appeal coming on for Orders this day, the Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
. The Counsel for the appellant files a memo seeking to
withdraw the appeal.
The memo is placed on record and the appeal is
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
JUDGE
nv
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited
Mr. H. Rajappa
Anand Byrareddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
