The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC without any substantive order on merits, as the petition had been withdrawn by the counsel for the petitioners before admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2016
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION No.3481 OF 2013
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONERS
(By Shri Ravi G.N., Advocate)
AND:
M/s. A1-Taiyaba Tours and Travels, (A partnership firm),
2
Having its office at No:29, Anjenayya Temple Street, J.C.Nagar, Bangalore – 560 006. Represented by its Partner Smt. Sameena Baig, Residing at No.2, 2nd Main, S.K.Garden, Benson Town Post, Bangalore – 560 046.
…RESPONDENT
(By Shri Mohammed Nasiruddin, Advocate)
This Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to quash the order dated
9.1.2012 passed by the IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore in C.C.No.1021/2012 vide Annexure-A on the file of the said court for the alleged offence under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC against the petitioners.
This Criminal Petition coming on for Admission this day,
the court made the following:
3
O R D E R
The Counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking
to withdraw the petition.
The memo is placed on record and the petition is
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
JUDGE
nv
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Reshma Baig
Smt. Jameela Khatoon
M/s. A1-Taiyaba Tours and Travels
ANAND BYRAREDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
