Writ petition challenging construction requested withdrawal. Court dismissed the petition on withdrawal. No substantive ruling made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2013
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. NAGAMOHAN DAS
W.P.NO. 14209/2013 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
Sri K. Amaresha Babu S/o Krishnappa Aged about 45 years R/at Vignana Nagara 2nd A Main, 13th Cross New Thipasandra Post Bangalore – 560 075. ...Petitioner
(By Sri K. Shivashankar, Advocate)
AND:
Opp. to Brindavana Layout Vignana Nagar, Bangalore 560 075.
(GA Served)
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of Constitution of India, praying to direct the respondent No.1 to 3 and 5 to stop the construction of the 4th respondent which is going on in the schedule property and etc.
This petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo
seeking withdrawal of the petition. Memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, the petition is hereby dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/-
JUDGE
HR
Sri K. Amaresha Babu
The Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike
The Joint Commissioner Mahadevapura Division BBMP
The Assistant Executive Engineer HAL Air Port Sub-Division BBMP
Sri. P.K. Somashekar Reddy
The Police Inspector HAL Police Station
H.N. Nagamohan Das
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
