Disposed

Mr Sadananda Bhandary v. the Deputy Commissioner

Karnataka HC3 Jun 2013WP/19503/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner sought directions to respondents to consider representations opposing the construction of a vented dam at Mugulyakatte in Boliyar village within specified time.

What did the court decide?

Direct respondents to consider petitioner's representations dated 12.02.2013 and 12.03.2013 opposing dam construction.

Mr Sadananda Bhandary Vs the Deputy Commissioner — Land Acquisition | Karnataka HC (2013)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

¶3

DATED THIS THE 3^RD DAY OF JUNE 2013

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. NAGAMOHAN DAS

¶6

WP NO.19503/2013 (LB-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN

¶8

SRI SADANANDA BHANDARY AGED 50 YEARS, S/O LATE AITHAPPA BHANDARY, MAGANDADI MANE, BOLIYAR VILLAGE AND POST, MANGALORE TALUK-574 153

¶9

... PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI P P HEGDE, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND

¶12

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT, MANGALORE-575 001

¶13

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER DAKSHINA KANNADA JILLA PANCHAYAT, KOTTARA, MANGALORE-575 006

¶14

THE CHIEF ENGINEER MINOR IRRIGATION (SOUTH) K.R. CIRLCE, BANGALORE-560 001

¶15

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MINOR IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, P M RAO ROAD,HAMPANKATTA,

MANGALORE-575 001

... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI N.B. VISHWANATH, AGA)

¶20

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER AND OTHERS DATED 12.2.2013 AND 12.3.2013 VIDE ANNEXURE-A & B WITHIN THE TIME STIPULATED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT AND TO RESTRAIN THE RESPONDENTS FROM CONSTRUCTING ANY VENTED DAM AT MUGULYAKATTE IN SURVEY NO.148 OF BOLIYAR VILLAGE, MANGALORE TALUK

¶21

THIS W.P. COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-

¶22

ORDER

¶23

Sri N.B. Vishwanath, learned AGA is directed to

¶24

take notice for R1.

¶25

In this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents to consider his representations dated 12.02.2013 Annexure-A and 12.03.2013 Annexure-B.

¶26

In these representations-Annexures A and B petitioner and other villagers submitted their objections for construction of Dam in Sy.No.148 of Boliyar Village,

¶27

¶28

Mangalore Taluk. These representations are given to respondent No.2.

¶29

No prejudice will be caused to respondent No.2 if they are directed to consider the petitioners’ representations at Annexures-A and B in accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible.

¶30

Accordingly writ petition is hereby disposed

¶31

of.

¶32

Three weeks time is granted to file the memo of

¶33

appearance.

¶34

Sbs*

Mr Sadananda Bhandary v. the Deputy Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr Sadananda Bhandary v. the Deputy Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vidya Vikas Educational Trust Vs State of Karnataka

M/S J B Hara Properties Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri B Nagarajaiah S/O Late Hotte Bommaiah Vs the Secretary

Jagadeeshaiah K R Vs the Tumkur Urban Development Authority

S M Sathyanarayan Vs the Assistant Revenue Officer

Smt Prema W/O K Panduranga Rao Vs State of Karnataka