The Assistant Executive Engineer v. Malleshi S/O Kallappa
Case brief
What is this about?
The court rejected a Criminal Petition seeking to quash criminal proceedings under Section 29 of the Industrial Disputes Act, holding the petition not maintainable on its face.
What did the court decide?
Rejection of the Criminal Petition for lack of maintainability.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2013
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.15037/2013
BETWEEN: The Assistant Executive Engineer Zilla Panchayat, Engineering Sub-Division, Raichur. Monappa S/o Mareppa Aged: 45 Years, R/o Raichur. … PETITIONER (By Shri Anant.S.Jahagirdar, for Shri Ameet Kumar Deshpande, Advocates ) AND: Malleshi S/o Kallappa Aged about: 45 Years, Occ: Work Supervisor Zilla Panchayat Engineering Sub-Division Raichur, R/o: Maharana Pratap Colony, Rampur Nagar, Raichur. … RESPONDENT (By Shri Prakash Yeli, Advocate )
2
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, by the Advocate praying that this Court may be pleased to quash the entire proceedings in C.C.No. 1227/2006 on the file of the JMFC-II, Raichur, the C.C. of the complaint is at Annexure-A.
This petition coming on for admission this day, the Court made the following:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Petition under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings for an Industrial Disputes Act violation is maintainable when the feigned nature of the allegation is for the trial court to d
Whether the reinstatement of the complainant effaces the allegation of an offence punishable under Section 29 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1949.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
The Assistant Executive Engineer Zilla Panchayat, Engineering Sub-Division, Raichur. Monappa S/o Mareppa
- respondent
Malleshi
Coram
ANAND BYRAREDDY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.P/15037/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court