The petitioner, the accused in an offence punishable under the IPC for dowry death and abetment, moved for bail under Section 439 CrPC. The petitioner's counsel sought to withdraw the petition, which the Court permitted.
Permission granted to withdraw the bail petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2013
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.15119 OF 2013
BETWEEN:
Ganesh S/o Vishwanath Chawan, Age about: 25 Years, Occ: Coolie, R/o Kala Kashiram Thanda, Taluk Aurad, District: Bidar. … PETITIONER
(Shri Mogha Sudhakar Rao, Advocate)
AND:
The State of Karnataka Through Hokrana Police Station Taluk Aurad, District Bidar. … RESPONDENT
(Shri Sanjay A Patil, Additional State Public Prosecutor)
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to release the accused/ petitioner on bail, in crime No.72/2012 (C.C.NO.562/2012) pending on the file of JMFC Court at Aurad, District Bidar, which is registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B), 143, 147, 149, 302, 142 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
2
This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw
the petition. Accordingly, he is permitted to withdraw the
same.
Sd/-
�������
swk
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the application for anticipatory bail pursuant to Section 439 CrPC be allowed after withdrawal.
Whether the withdrawal of the bail petition should be permitted.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ganesh S/o Vishwanath Chawan
The State of Karnataka Through Hokrana Police Station
Anand Byrappa
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
