In a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings, Justice Anand Byrareddy dismissed the petition for non-prosecution, noting the petitioner's counsel was absent and an alternative remedy existed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2013
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.15001/2013
BETWEEN:
Lakhan S/o Ruplal @ Rupchand Daka, Age: 24 Years, Occ: Private Service, R/o: Shahabad, Taluk: Chittapur, District Gulbarga. … PETITIONER
(By Shri R.Y.Deshmukh, Advocate absent)
AND:
(By Shri Sanjay A Patil, Additional State Public Prosecutor, for Respondent No.1 Notice to Respondent No.2 served )
2
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, by the Advocate praying that this Court may be pleased to allow the petition and quash the Criminal Proceedings on the file of C.C.No.93/2011 pending before JMFC Shahabad in Crime No.58/2010 of Shahabad Police Station.
This petition coming on for admission this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner remains absent. It
is observed that he had remained absent on the previous occasions as well.
however, is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
msr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Petition filed to quash proceedings should be allowed or dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lakhan S/o Ruplal
The State of Karnataka
Dilip S/o SreeKishan Ladda
Anand Byrareddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
