This is an application under Article 226 seeking quashing charges under Section 227 CrPC. The Single Judge held the lower order sound and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(AR LW HA jA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKi’ CUB
A lIT 3 2
)1
Ri Si fl (ii 2
4’ ) )‘. I (
Ii I I
TilE I ADDL. DDISTIZICT & SESSiONS JLDGE1 AT GULI3ARGA AND CON SEQUEN1’LY ALLOW il-I K APPLICATION FUEL) BY THE PIrflTIONER FOR DISC1 IARGING FROM Ti JE AI3OVE CRIMINAl. CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTiCE AND EQUflY.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The application flied U/S. 227 of Cr. P.C.. is rejected by the I Addi. Sessions Judge. Gulbarga. The accused charged for committing oirences P/U/S. 406. 308 R/w S. 34 of IPC and S. 136. 137 and 138 of Indian Electricity Act. The facts and material discussed by the learned I Addl. Sessions Judge, Gulbarga. to show that there is a prima-fade case against the petitioners. The order Is sound and proper does not call for any liii erferet ice. Hence. petit ion is dismissed.
JUDGE SdI
VF3C
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order of the Additional Sessions Judge rejecting the Article 227 application stands correct.
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Petitioner
The State
Unidentified Judge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
