Dismissed
Eadar Satyanarian S/O Narsimha Murthy Ors. v. the State of Karnataka
Karnataka HCCRL.RP/2525/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KARNAIAKA ILIRUUII BFNU I II…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF KARNAIAKA ILIRUUII BFNU I II…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ILIRUUII BFNU I II &tJuBll tJl IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNAIAKA
\ I) S 1 I,. )
(
L1 \3 i1 I
RIIIflIL <IVSOJ Pb II NNu 52bJ1t) 2
I T & IH -‘ ‘\ c. N N .5 J N h1 I;I L’IJ’ : \ jL\t Ni’ ‘ ‘.u’ II Nj I i S ( ) (
•1 •!\ b(’j.t I C’ , ‘..)1 ‘4’VV%%’_”.t%’1 ‘h i’l
.!. (.‘‘ •
Cb•_%S.. N ‘at I)’: I\ If •I ‘ I •I (4. ‘‘I’ ‘p
ç. V! iii 1%’ (r I. tI,i ! I I i..e i’ ‘0 •f.. f)J Ii . I’i Ii’ ; fir. ‘\ C 1 1
I I % I •, )( 1 )I•. ,,_) ‘C, ‘:1 •. 4. I
, I I I 4 I a’. ...t• ‘. 1,1 JI •fIT ‘I’ 4. I I ) I I ‘. 1% ‘I • •
i\ IrIIS T’[”I ifi\j. i)\ fljcfIF_iC’ ITF.1(T. .)U s ::t!% ) j 1t•I’flT •f)S j!U)\ £
ORDER
•1, ‘L’: •! a. atI ..f If ‘ gt •1 •• t ‘‘ .1 I . ‘ ,, I • • j; a. •.‘t ti •. •‘— • • • C •
I I C
prima-lade case against die petitioners and hence, the not call for interference. Hence, petition is dismissed. order passed by the trial court is sound and proper does and order of the trial court It Is evident that there Is a 3. On going through the ease of 11w prosecution
SdP pJDGE
VBC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court