KA?N1 IKA CIR( WI BENCH AF GULBaRGA \ i D…
Petition dismissed as case was only under investigation and not admissible.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
INIJIEHIGI OUR1 OF 1KA?N IKA CIR( WI BENCH AF GULBaRGA
\ i D 1111 IJV (j I
( E J I ,[ Ir\
CRi1iNAttFiifiO ui51z3Oi2
H T1 \
J \ 1’ i IZ ( ,\ç -1< if f’ I • ;T 1. t<LIi’’ ‘ , 1J “If I - u ,‘ ( ) I,I I I - I I
FROM 20/05/2005 TO 22/062005 DIST. GULI3ARGA TQLUKA PANCFIAYATAS A.E.E.. SHAHAPUR NOW PRESENT WORKING Z.P. CIIITAPUR
S. TQLUKt PANCHAYAT SI JiM IAPUR 1/C EXECLTI1VE OFFICER AS E.O.TALUKA I’ANCHAYAT. LINGASUGUR FROM 23/11/200810 05/19/2009 NOW PRESENT WORKING C S PATIL Age: 1)1ST. RAId IT !R
Si
Lu. A.E.E.. MINOR ERRIGATION AFZALPIJR EXECUTIVE OFFICER FROM 19/07/201010 11/09/2011 NOW PRESENT WORKING DIST. GULBARGA TQLUKA PANCHAYAT SHAHAPUR Age: II MALLIKARJUN
PETITIONER(S)
(By SrL/Snn : SANJAY A PA’BL)
AND
(r3v SrI./Smt : A SYEI) FIABEEB. Advocate FOR R2; Sri Ameetkurnar Deshapande, Adv for R- 1)
TE-IE PETITIONER PRAYiNG TI uS CRLP Ff121) U/S. 482 or CR.P.C: BY fl IE Al )VOCATE R.)R IEON’BLE COURT ‘LO
j
L) ) 1k I Hi ;T) ‘ ‘i\i A( II. ) Si I\i\j S Iii ‘‘I ii(L HZ AC S’:. ; I AL S iii cS i\C H () N [ I 1 1 1
‘I ‘ iT UTh11 I j5 i; [1’ t c S I
QRDET
D
stage, the petition cannot be enrert ainecl. The case is still under investigation. At this nebulous Accordingly. 2. The contentions raised have to be investigated.
the peudon is dismissed.
sal TUDGt
Minor Irrigation
T.Q. Shahapur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
