Dismissed¶¶15

Ms Siyaram Enterprises v. Drinking Water and Sanitation

Jharkhand HC6 Apr 2026WPC/4522/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

M/s Siyaram Enterprises v. State of Jharkhand & Ors., W.P.(C) No. 4522 of 2012 (High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi, Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J., decided 06.04.2026): petition under Article 226 for direction to refund earnest money against officials of the Drinking Water and Sanitation Department; dismissed as withdrawn with liberty after respondents' supplementary counter-affidavit disclosed pass-book and bank guarantee made in favour of petitioner; no ruling on merits.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to find out his remedy if any grievance is still there; pending I.A., if any, stands disposed of. ¶¶15

Ms Siyaram Enterprises Vs Drinking Water and… — Writ and Judicial Review | Jharkhand HC (2026)

¶1

 ( 2026:JHHC:9516 )

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 4522 of 2012

¶3

M/s Siyaram Enterprises, Barwa Road Dhaiya, P.O. and P.S. Dhanbad, DistrictDhanbad, represented through Siyaram Rai, son of late Dudheshwar Rai, Barwa Road, Dhaiya, P.O. and P.S. Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad

¶4

…….Petitioner

¶5

-Versus-

¶6

The State of Jharkhand,

¶7

The Superintending Engineer, Drinking Water and Sanitation Department Hazaribagh Circle, P.O. and P.S. Hazaribagh, District-Hazaribagh

¶8

The Executive Engineer, Drinking Water and Sanitation Division Ramgarh, P.O. and P.S. Ramgarh, District-Hazaribagh …………….Respondents

¶9

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Sanjay Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Gaurang Jajodia, A.C. to G.P.-II

¶11

13/ 06.04.2026 : This writ petition has been filed under section 226 of

¶12

the Constitution of India for direction upon the respondent to refund the earnest money lying with them.

¶13

In the light of statement made in paras 12 and 13 of the supplementary counter-affidavit wherein it is disclosed that pass-book and bank guarantee have been made in favour of the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to find out his remedy if any grievance is still there.

¶14

Learned counsels for the respondent-State has got no objection.

¶15

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Pending I.A, if any, stands disposed of.

¶16

( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)

¶17

satyarthi-

¶18

Dt.06.04.2026

Ms Siyaram Enterprises v. Drinking Water and Sanitation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ms Siyaram Enterprises v. Drinking Water and Sanitation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mandeo Choudhary And Ors. Vs State of Jharkhand And Ors.

Gulsair Mallick Vs the State of Jharkhand

MD Nafis Ansari Alias Nafis Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Dharmendra Kumar Yadav Vs State of Jharkhand

Azad Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Manoj Kumar Gour Vs Collectariate