Allowed¶17

Gulsair Mallick v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC2 Apr 2026A.B.A./1196/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A.B.A. No. 1196 of 2026; High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi; anticipatory bail allowed; Section 392 IPC; Mandar P.S. Case No.48 of 2023; petitioner not named in FIR; name surfaced in confessional statement of co-accused Abutalib Mallick; parity with co-accused granted bail in ABA No.5059 of 2023 and ABA No.101 of 2024; direction to surrender within two weeks; release on terms/conditions/sureties deemed fit; Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi; decided 02.04.2026.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail: petitioner to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and be released on such terms, conditions or sureties as the learned Court deems fit and proper. ¶17

Gulsair Mallick Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:JHHC:9460

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1196 of 2026

¶3

----

¶4

Gulsair Mallick, aged about 37 years, S/o Mustafa Mallick, R/o village – Chachkapi, PO – Sakra, PS – Bero, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand .... Petitioner

¶5

-- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party

¶6

¶7

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

¶8

--For the Petitioner :- Mr. Rakesh Kr. No.2, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Advocate ----

¶9

02 /02.04.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State.

¶10

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Mandar P.S. Case No.48 of 2023 for the alleged offences registered under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of learned J.M., Ranchi.

¶11

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has come on the confessional statement of another co-accused Abutalib Mallick. He further submits that in identical situation co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No.5059 of 2023 and 101 of 2024.

¶12

4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that serious allegations are there and the case is registered under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code.

¶13

5. Considering that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and

¶14

--1--

¶15

A.B.A. No. 1196 of 2026

¶16

2026:JHHC:9460

¶17

the name of the petitioner has come on the confessional statement of co-accused and in identical situation co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail in the aforesaid ABAs and in that view of the matter the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper.

¶18

(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)

¶19

Dated 02.04.2026 Sangam/

¶20

--2--

¶21

A.B.A. No. 1196 of 2026

Gulsair Mallick v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gulsair Mallick v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sk Billal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Vivek Panjiyara Vs the State of Jharkhand

Baba Industries Vs Central Coalfields Ltd. And Ors.

Arvind Kumar Murmu Alias Arvind Manjhi Vs State of Jharkhand

Koushal Kishore Shahi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Kunal Kumar @ Bittu Nandi Vs the State of Jharkhand