Dismissed¶12

Shabaaz Ansari @ Shahbaz @ Kada v. State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC11 May 2026Cr.Rev./426/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Neutral Citation 2026:JHHC:14082; High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi; Cr. Revision No. 426 of 2026; Shabaaz Ansari @ Shahbaz @ Kada v. The State of Jharkhand; juvenile bail refusal upheld; Azad Nagar P.S. Case No. 24 of 2025; Criminal Appeal No. 279 of 2025; Children Court Jamshedpur; CCTV footage; chopper recovery on confessional statement; para 136 case diary; Md. Tausif @ Ghochu allegation; revision dismissed at this stage; Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.; decided 11.05.2026.

What did the court decide?

The CCTV footage clearly indicated the presence of the petitioner at the place of occurrence when the son of the informant was being assaulted, which weighed against interference with the orders refusing bail. ¶11

Shabaaz Ansari @ Shahbaz @ Kada Vs State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:14082 )

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 426 of 2026

¶3

Shabaaz Ansari @ Shahbaz @ Kada, S/o Md. Hamid @ Mohammad Hamid, represented through his father and natural guardian Md. Hamid @ Mohammad Hamid, R/o Road No. 2 Old Purulia Road, P.O. & P.S. Azad Nagar, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum, Jharkhand … … Petitioner

¶4

Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ----------

¶5

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY

¶6

For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate For the State : A.P.P.

¶7

03/11.05.2026 Heard Mr. Vikash Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶8

This application is directed against the judgement dated 11.12.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge, Children Court, Jamshedpur in Criminal Appeal No. 279 of 2025, whereby and whereunder, the order dated 09.10.2025 passed by the learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Jamshedpur in connection with Azad Nagar P.S. Case No. 24 of 2025, rejecting the prayer for bail of the petitioner has been affirmed.

¶9

Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It has further been submitted that as per the CCTV footage it was one Md. Tausif @ Ghochu who was responsible for assaulting the son of the informant with a chopper.

¶10

Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and while referring to para 136 of the case diary has submitted that it was on the disclosure made by the petitioner the chopper was recovered from the dam.

¶11

The allegations reveal that the son of the informant was assaulted by several accused persons which resulted in his death. The CCTV footage clearly indicates about the presence of the petitioner at the place of occurrence when the son of the informant was being assaulted and para 136 of the case diary records that on the confessional statement of the petitioner the chopper which was used in commission of the murder had been recovered.

¶12

Regard being had to the above, I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned orders and consequently this revision application stands dismissed at this stage.

¶13

(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)

¶14

Dated, the 11^th May, 2026 A. Sanga/Uploaded on 12 /05/2026

¶15

-2-

Shabaaz Ansari @ Shahbaz @ Kada v. State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shabaaz Ansari @ Shahbaz @ Kada v. State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Mahto Vs the State of Jharkhand

Birendra Rai Vs the State of Jharkhand

Karu Verma Alias Karu Kumar Verma Allias Karu Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Saba Khatoon @ Sabbu Khatoon Vs State of Jharkhand

Ravi Kumar Sahu Vs the State of Jharkhand

Shekh Saddam Alias Sheikh Saddam Vs the State of Jharkhand