Uday Kamal v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC12 May 2026A.B.A./842/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application (A.B.A. No. 842 of 2026) before the Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi, concerning Rikhiya P.S. Case No. 138 of 2022 pending before the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Deoghar; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to move before the trial Court on the strength of Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI, (2022) 10 SCC 51; State raised no objection; single-judge bench of Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi; decision dated 12.05.2026.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal permitted with liberty to move before the learned Court below (Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Deoghar) on the strength of Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr., (2022) 10 SCC 51. ¶17-18

Uday Kamal Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:JHHC:14488

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 842 of 2026

¶3

----

¶4

Uday Kamal, aged about 47 years, son of Deo Nandan Saha @ Deonandan Shah, resident of Motipahari Bara, Sahebganj, PO and PS – Sahebganj, District – Sahebganj .... Petitioner

¶5

-- Versus --

¶6

The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party

¶7

¶8

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

¶9

For the Petitioner	--- :-	Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate
For the State	:-	Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, Advocate

¶10

¶11

03 /12.05.2026 The matter relates to Rikhiya P.S. Case No. 138 of 2022 pending

¶12

in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Deoghar.

¶13

2. After some argument, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to move before the learned Court on the strength of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Versus Central

¶14

Bureau of Investigation & Anr. , reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51.

¶15

3. Learned counsel appearing for the State has got no objection.

¶16

4. Permission is accorded.

¶17

5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the

¶18

aforesaid liberty.

¶19

(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)