Disposed

Azharuddin @ Azhar Ali v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC10 Jun 2026B.A./5072/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Sections 304(2), 115(2) and 318(4) BNS arising from Argora P.S. Case No.48 of 2026; charge-sheet filed and accused in custody since February 2026. Court granted bail with conditions including cooperation with trial, furnishing mobile number and Aadhaar copy, and non-tampering with witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of trial cooperation, fixed mobile number, Aadhaar submission and no witness tampering.

Azharuddin @ Azhar Ali Vs the State of Jharkhand — Bail and Remand | Jharkhand HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:JHHC:16693] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5072 of 2026

¶2

------

¶3

Azharuddin @ Azhar Ali, Age – 31 Years, S/o- Late Zakir Ali, R/o -280, Nehru Camp, Govind Puri, Kalka Ji, P.O. + P.S.- Ali, Dist- South Delhi, Delhi .... .... …. Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party

¶6

------

¶7

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶8

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocate Mr. Fahim Akhtar, Advocate Ms. Aarti Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Azeemuddin, Addl.P.P ------

¶9

Order No.02 Dated-10-06-2026

¶10

Heard the parties.

¶11

The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Argora P.S. Case No.48 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 304 (2), 115 (2), 318 (4) of the B.N.S., 2023.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner snatched away the A.T.M. Card of the informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will cooperate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 25.02.2026 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.

¶13

Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

¶14

Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/(Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.F.C., Ranchi in connection with Argora P.S.

¶15

Case No.48 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.

¶16

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶17

Dated-10.06.2026-Animesh/

Azharuddin @ Azhar Ali v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Azharuddin @ Azhar Ali v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Govind Mahto Vs State of Jharkhand

Chandan Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Uma Shankar Tiwari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Jetha Kachhap Vs the State of Jharkhand

Abhishek Munda @ Abhishek Munda Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ashutosh Tiwary Vs the State of Jharkhand