Diwakar Yadav @ Divakar Kumar Yadav Vs the State of… — Cheating and Forgery | Jharkhand HC (2026)

Diwakar Yadav @ Divakar Kumar Yadav Vs the State of… — Cheating and Forgery | Jharkhand HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Enlargement of the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-cybercrime, Special Judge, Deoghar, subject to the stated conditions (pairvikar and close-relative bailors, attendance on every date with cancellation of bail bond on single default, deposit of self-attested Aadhar Card copy and mobile number, full co-operation with trial proceedings); order to be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/email along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition.

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner, in custody since 15.04.2026 in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 57 of 2026 pending before the Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-cyber-crime, Special Judge, Deoghar, should be enlarged on bail.

Court's answer

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 57 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-cybercrime, Special Judge, Deoghar.

Ratio / Principle

Bail was granted after hearing the learned counsels, considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and the charge-sheet has already been submitted.

Key takeaways

Bail granted subject to conditions: (i) one bailor to be the petitioner's present pairvikar; (ii) the other bailor a close relative; (iii) attendance in court on each and every date, with cancellation of the bail bond on even a single default; (iv) deposit of a self-attested copy of the petitioner's Aadhar Card along with his mobile number, which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court; and (v) full co-operation with the proceedings before the learned trial court.ratio¶16

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

BAIL APPLICATION ALLOWED — Cyber-crime case (Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 57 of 2026) registered under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of the Information & Technology Amendment Act, 2008, pending before the Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-cyber-crime, Special Judge, Deoghar. Petitioner Diwakar Yadav @ Divakar Kumar Yadav in custody since 15.04.2026; charge-sheet submitted on the date of hearing; no criminal antecedent; one mobile phone and one SIM card alleged recovered, 4 crime links found, one victim alleged to support the prosecution; State opposed but did not dispute petitioner's submissions. Held: petitioner enlarged on bail on bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, on conditions — one bailor to be his present pairvikar, the other a close relative; attendance on each and every date with cancellation of bail bond on even a single default; deposit of self-attested Aadhar Card copy and mobile number (not to be changed during pendency without prior permission of court); full co-operation with trial proceedings. Order communicated to the court concerned through FAX/email with copy of affidavit filed with the bail petition. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)