Sumit Mahato v. State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application (A.B.A. No. 3819 of 2026), Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi, decided 14.07.2026 by Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi. Petitioner Sumit Mahato versus the State of Jharkhand (Opposite Party); counsel: Rajesh Kumar Mishra for petitioner, Jitendra Pandey for State. Underlying case: Adityapur PS Case No.255 of 2025, pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella (District Seraikella-Kharsawan). Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an appropriate petition before the learned court concerned, to be decided in accordance with law without prejudice to this order. Keywords: anticipatory bail, A.B.A., withdrawal of petition, liberty, without prejudice, dismissal as withdrawn, Adityapur PS Case 255/2025, CJM Seraikella. No statutes or precedents cited; no bail merits decided.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with liberty to move before the learned court concerned (Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella) by filing an appropriate petition, to be decided in accordance with law without prejudice to this order.