Dismissed¶20

Phoolo Devi v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC18 Dec 2025Cr.Rev./622/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Jharkhand High Court Ranchi; Cr. Revision No. 622 of 2024; Phoolo Devi, Shrishti Kumari, Sakshi Kumari vs The State of Jharkhand and Om Prakash Mahto; challenge to order dated 18.09.2023 in Original Maintenance Case No. 254 of 2023, Addl. Principal Judge, Addl. Family Court-I, Ranchi; maintenance matter; permission to withdraw sought by counsel Krishna Prajapati; no objection by State counsel Anuradha Sahay, A.P.P.; petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending I.A. disposed of; Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi; decided 18.12.2025; no merits adjudicated, no statute or precedent discussed.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the revision petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn and pending I.A., if any, disposed of. ¶20

Phoolo Devi Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

 ( 2025:JHHC:38027 )

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 622 of 2024

¶3

1.Phoolo Devi, aged about 32 years, wife of Om Prakash Mahto, daughter of

¶4

Jalendra Mahto

¶5

Shrishti Kumari, aged about 9 years, daughter of Om Prakash Mahto 3. Sakshi Kumari, aged about 6 years, daughter of Om Prakash Mahto, (Petitioner nos. 2 and 3 both are minor daughters of Phoolo Devi and Om Prakash Mahto represented through their mother and natural guardian Phoolo Devi) All are at present resident of village Tusmo, P.O. Saparom, PS. Nagri, DistrictRanchi, Jharkhand

¶6

…… Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Jharkhand

¶9

Om Prakash Mahto, son of Lal Mohan Mahto, resident of village Lohagada, P.o. Lodhma, P.S. Karra, District Khunti, Jharkhand, 827013 …… Opposite Parties

¶10

---------

¶11

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners: Mr. Krishna Prajapati, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, A. P.P.

¶12

………. 05/Dated: 18/12/2025

¶13

Defects are ignored.

¶14