Dismissed¶4

Nandlal Pandey v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC17 Dec 2025Cr.Rev./169/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi — Cr. Revision No. 169 of 2023 (neutral citation 2025:JHHC:37842), decided 17.12.2025 by Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. Petitioner Nandlal Pandey versus The State of Jharkhand and Annpurna Devi (Opp. Parties). Petition related to Maintenance Case No. 148 of 2019 pending before Principal Judge, Family Court, Garhwa. Counsel for petitioner sought withdrawal citing ongoing compromise talks between husband and wife; counsel for O.P. No. 2 had no objection; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take steps for compromise. Keywords: withdrawal, compromise, maintenance case, family court, Garhwa.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to take steps for compromise. ¶4

Nandlal Pandey Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2025:JHHC:37842

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI

¶3

----

¶4

Cr. Revision No. 169 of 2023

¶5

----

¶6

Nandlal Pandey, aged about 61 years, son of late Kedar Pandey, resident of Village Ramanujganj Near Bus Stand Naka, Post-Ramanujganj, PS Ramanujganj, District Balrampur, Chhatisgarh .... Petitioner(s)

¶7

-- Versus --

¶8

1.The State of Jharkhand

¶9

2.Annpurna Devi, aged about 44 years, wife of Nandlal Pandey, resident of Village and Post Ramanujganj, PS Ramanujganj, District Balrampur, Chhatisgarh, Temporary Address Late Radheshyam Pathak, Village Bhandariya, PO and PS Bhandariya, District Garhwa, Jharkhand

¶10

…… ….. .... Opp. Parties ----

¶11

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

¶12

For the Petitioner(s)	:-	Mr. Surya Narayan Sahu, Advocate
For the State	:-	Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate
For the O.P.No.2	:-	Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwary, Advocate
		----

¶13

13 /17.12.2025 This matter relates to Maintenance Case No.148 of 2019 and the case is pending in the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Garhwa.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that talk for compromise between the husband and wife is going on and in view of that, he seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition on the ground that talk of compromise is going on.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the O.P.No.2 has got no objection for the same.

¶16

In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty of taking steps for compromise.

¶17

( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)

¶18

Dated : 17^th Dec., 2025 SI/

Nandlal Pandey v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nandlal Pandey v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bechan Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Pradhan Oraon Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Nishi Kant Shukla Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ashok Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand

Satendra Sao Alias Satendra Saw Vs the State of Jharkhand

Tinku Vishwakarma Vs the State of Jharkhand