Aftab Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand through A.C.B

¶1

2025:JHHC:15440

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3581 of 2025

¶3

------

¶4

Aftab Ansari, aged about 32 years, son of Samsuddin Mian, resident of Village-Pundara, P.O-Edla, P.S.-Simariya, District-Chatra.

¶5

…. …. Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Jharkhand through A.C.B.

¶8

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Vineet Kr. Vashistha, Spl. P.P. ------

¶9

05/Dated: 13.06.2025

¶10

1. The instant application has been filed under Sections 483 and 484 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, in connection with A.C.B. P.S. Case No.03 of 2025, registered for the offence under Section 7(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, pending in the court of learned Spl. Judge (Vigilance)-cumAdditional Sessions Judge-II, Hazaribagh.

¶11

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case.

¶12

3. It has been contended on behalf of the petitioner that there is no independent witnesses in this case and as such, the allegation of taking bribe amount is false and baseless.

¶13

4. It has further been contended that the charge-sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner is having no criminal

¶14

¶15

2025:JHHC:15440

¶16

antecedent. The ground of custody has also been taken that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 04.03.2025.

¶17

5. While on the other hand, learned Spl. P.P. appearing for the State, however, has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. It has been contended that the petitioner has demanded Rs.60,000/- as bribe for declaring the judgment in favour of the informant.

¶18

6. This Court has heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶19

7. The charge-sheet in this case has already been submitted. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 04.03.2025, i.e., for the period of more than three months. 8. This Court, considering the aforesaid fact and taking into consideration the period of custody, is of the view that the instant bail application deserves to be allowed. 9. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands allowed. 10. In consequence thereof, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Spl. Judge (Vigilance)-cum-Additional Sessions Judge-II, Hazaribagh, in connection with A.C.B. P.S. Case No.03 of 2025, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the trial, failing which, the learned trial court is at liberty to take appropriate steps in accordance with law.

¶20

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

¶21

Rohit/-

¶22

Aftab Ansari v. the State of Jharkhand through A.C.B

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aftab Ansari v. the State of Jharkhand through A.C.B

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Swarup Rungta Vs the State of Jharkhand through Central Bureau of Investigation Dhanbad

Janak Raj Sharma Vs Bharat Coking Coal Limited And O

Sahid Khan Alias Shahid Khan Vs the Central Bureau of Investigation

Akhilesh Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand through Anti Corruption Bureau

Gurvinder Singh Vs the Central Bureau of Investigation

Dr.Brajenra Kumar Tiwary Alias B.K.Tiwary Vs State of Jharkhand And Anr.