Dismissed

Sudhir Kumar Rajak v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC21 Jun 2024Cont.(Cvl)/748/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This batch of contempt applications alleging wilful disobedience of earlier orders was disposed of after the opposite parties submitted that compliance had been achieved via a government letter fixing counselling dates and issuing a final selection list.

What did the court decide?

The contempt proceedings against the concerned opposite parties were dropped and the applications were disposed of.

Sudhir Kumar Rajak Vs the State of Jharkhand — Contempt of Court | Jharkhand HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

Cont. Case (Civil) No. 748 of 2022 Sudhir Kumar Rajak & Others ….. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others ….. Opposite Parties

¶3

With Cont. Case (Civil) No. 377 of 2022 Tulsi Das Mahato & Others ….. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others ….. Opposite Parties

¶4

With Cont. Case (Civil) No. 602 of 2022 Deonath Kumar & Others ….. Petitioners

¶5

The State of Jharkhand & Others ….. Opposite Parties

¶6

----For the Petitioners: Mr. Abhijeet Kumar For the O.Ps: Mr. Gaurav Raj, A.C to A.A.G-II -----

¶7

11/21.06.2024 The present batch of contempt applications have been filed against the concerned opposite parties alleging wilful disobedience and non-compliance of the order dated 16.02.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 2378 of 2019 [Paras Nath Mandal Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.] along with other analogous cases as well as the order dated 15.09.2023 passed by learned Division Bench in L.P.A No. 203 of 2022 [The State of Jharkhand & Ors. Vs. Paras Nath Mandal].

¶8

Mr. Gaurav Raj, learned A.C to A.A.G-II appearing on behalf of the opposite parties, while producing a copy of letter No. 786 dated 19.06.2024 issued by the Director, Primary Education, Government of Jharkhand to all the

¶9

¶10

Deputy Commissioners and the District Superintendents of Education in the State of Jharkhand submits that different dates with respect to the events of counselling in terms with the order dated 16.02.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 2378 of 2019 along with other analogous cases as well as the order dated 15.09.2023 passed by learned Division Bench in L.P.A No. 203 of 2022 have been fixed. The said letter also suggests that the final selection list will be issued on 07.08.2024 for appointment on the posts of Assistant Teachers under para as well as non-para categories. It is thus submitted that the afoersaid orders of this Court have now been complied.

¶11

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering that the afoersaid orders of this Court have now been complied, there is no need to further proceed with the present matter.

¶12

The contempt proceedings as against the concerned opposite parties are hereby dropped.

¶13

These contempt applications stand disposed of.

¶14

Let a copy of letter No. 786 dated 19.06.2024 be taken on record.

¶15

Satish/-

¶16

(RAJESH SHANKAR, J)

¶17

Sudhir Kumar Rajak v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudhir Kumar Rajak v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Parash Nath Gupta Vs the Chairman Medningar Municipal Corporation

Xavier Herenz Vs the State of Jharkhand

Paras Nath Mandal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Tulsi Das Mahato Vs the State of Jharkhand

Deonath Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand