Bail application by an accused in a cybercrime case involving cheating, forgery and IT Act offences. The court found it just and fair to enlarge the petitioner on bail, noting no criminal history, custody since April 2024, and charge-sheet already submitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6297 of 2024
Rinal Kumar Das, aged about 29 years, son of Sudhir Das, resident of Village Sahebnagar Thadi, P.O. and P.S. Kunda, District- Deoghar, Jharkhand ..... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand …. Opp. Party
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVNEET KUMAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, APP
-----
appearing for the State.
(Navneet Kumar, J.)
R.Kumar
-2-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused in a cybercrime case, in custody since 27.04.2024 with charge-sheet filed, should be enlarged on bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rinal Kumar Das
The State of Jharkhand
Navneet Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
