Regular bail in a murder and disappearance case where the petitioner was named only in a co-accused's confessional statement; the co-accused had already been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench, the State conceded parity, and bail was allowed with bonds of Rs. 30,000 with two sureties.
Applicant released on bail on bond of Rs. 30,000 with two like sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 5678 of 2024
Nakul Ram, aged about 37 years, S/o Raghu Ram, R/o Village-Hemrodih, P.O. Argali, P.S.-Dhanwar, District-Giridih …. … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand …. ... Opp. Party --------
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH CHAND
For the Petitioner : Mr. Prabhash Ch. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, A.P.P.
Order No. 07/ dated 05.09.2024
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
5 O’ clock she went to house of Deepak Yadav he told that he knows nothing of him then she went towards Subhash Public School. Search was made of him and came to know from his cousin sister Sangeeta Devi that in village Nokadih, the mob had gathered to the well wherein the dead-body of some person was lying. She identified the photo of the dead-body to be of her husband and reached to the well. Thereafter informed to the Police and this F.I.R. was lodged.
(Subhash Chand, J.)
P.K.S
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant, implicated only through a co-accused's confession, should be released on bail in a murder case.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Nakul Ram
The State of Jharkhand
Subhash Chand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
