online form on the official portal. He claimed himself to be in category EBC I. As per him, he filled up the form on 29.09.2015 and the last date was 30.09.2015. When he received the Admit Card, he found that his address was incorrectly mentioned there. He prayed for rectification of his address, mentioned in the Admit Card, but, no action was taken. The petitioner appeared in the preliminary examination and he was declared successful. He was called for interview, but this time also in the said Admit Card the address was also wrongly mentioned. He cleared the mains and also appeared in the Medical and Physical Test. After conclusion of the process, he could come to know that he has cleared all the tests and secured 139 marks, which is more than the cutoff marks, but he was not offered appointment. Be it mentioned that the cutoff marks in his category was 110. Being aggrieved by the said rejection, he had filed writ petition being W.P.(S) No. 2234 of 2018. In the writ petition, a counter affidavit was filed by the Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, taking a plea that during verification of documents, it was detected that the name of the petitioner, though was Gurupad Pramanik, yet in the form which he had submitted, he had declared his father’s name as Ramesh Mahato and mother’s name as Vinota Devi and the Aadhaar Number was 4082xxxx144, (I am deliberately withholding some portion of the Aadhaar Number for the sake of privacy). His height was mentioned as 182 c.m. and his chest was 83 c.m. The said form also bears the photograph of the petitioner with his signature and thumb impression. Thus, the respondents concluded that there is huge discrepancy in the form and the documents submitted, thus they doubted the genuineness. The petitioner filed a photocopy of the form, which according to him, he had taken a printout at the time of filling up the form, which suggests that his father’s name is late Shambhu Pramanik and mother’s name is Ahilya Devi and Aadhaar Number is 444xxxx448. As per the petitioner, aforesaid form is the genuine one, which he had filled up online and had received printout of the same. 5. Learned Single Judge, considering the claim of the parties, arrived at a conclusion that the information, which the petitioner submitted in the online application form was different from the documents produced by him at the time of document verification, thus, the candidature of the petitioner was correctly not accepted by the respondents. Learned Single Judge also took into consideration that as per Clause 15 of the advertisement, entire responsibility of filling up of the form and the information furnished has to be
