Petitioner instructed counsel to withdraw the writ petition. Court allowed withdrawal and disposed of the matter without costs.
Allow withdrawal of writ petition; dispose of pending application, if any; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 1213 of 2017
Tata Steel Limited through its General Attorney Sri R. Balasubramanium ... ... ... Petitioner
Versus
… … ... Respondents
CORAM: SRI SANJAYA KUMAR MISHRA, C.J. SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
--------For the Petitioner: Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Yogesh Modi, A.C. to AAG-IA
29/Dated: 05.07.2023
This matter is taken up in the hybrid mode. Nobody has any objection to that.
Mr. Amit Kumar Das, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has instructed him to withdraw the case. A Memo to that effect has been filed. It shall form part of the records.
In that view of the matter, the instant writ petition is hereby,
allowed to be withdrawn.
Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
There shall be no orders as to costs.
Grant urgent certified copy of this order as per the Rules.
(Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, C.J.)
(Ananda Sen, J.)
APK/VK
Tata Steel Limited
The State of Jharkhand
Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand
Principal Secretary, Department of Law, Government of Jharkhand
Principal Secretary, Land and Revenue Department, Government of Jharkhand
Sanjaya Kumar Mishra
Ananda Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
