Raju Prasad v. State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
The revision petition dismissed as abated because the petitioner Raju Prasad died during the pendency of the proceedings.
The revision petition dismissed as abated because the petitioner Raju Prasad died during the pendency of the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Revision No. 480 of 2009
Raju Prasad ..… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------For the Petitioner : For the State : Ms. Nehala Sharmin, APP ---------
04/Dated: 10th January, 2023
Pursuant to the order dated 23.09.2022 notice was issued to the petitioner. A service report has been received indicating therein that petitioner namely- Raju Prasad has died.
2. In view of the aforesaid fact, the instant application is dismissed as abated against the petitioner namely- Raju Prasad.
3. Let the order be communicated to the courts below and also at the postal address of the petitioner.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
Amardeep/
RAJU PRASAD
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
DEEPAK ROSHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court