B P Gupta v. The State Of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal…
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Revision No. 1713 of 2017
B.P. Gupta @ Barmdeo Prasad Gupta
..… Petitioner
Versus
1.The State of Jharkhand
2.M/s Tata Motors Company Pvt. Ltd.
….. Opp. Parties
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mrs. Shweta Singh, A.P.P. For O.P. No. 2 : Mrs. Rashmi Kumar, Advocate
11/10.08.2023 None appears on behalf of the petitioner, however, learned A.P.P. and learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2 are present.
2. It appears that none appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 26.7.2023 and even today, i.e. on 10.08.2023, when the case was called out no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
3. Under the circumstances, this Criminal Revision Application No. 1713 of 2017 is dismissed for default.
(Sanjay Prasad, J.)
s.m.
B.P. Gupta @ Barmdeo Prasad Gupta
State of Jharkhand
M/s Tata Motors Company Pvt. Ltd.
Sanjay Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court