Revision admitted to find that the underlying trial case was disposed of below, rendering the revision infructuous, which led to its dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 1149 of 2018
….
Mukesh Yadav …… Petitioner
Versus
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
-----
For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, A. P. P.
…. .
07/04.07.2023 It appears from the report sent vide Letter No. 580 dated 01.07.2023 sent by learned Sessions Judge, Latehar that Sessions Trial Case No. 39 of 2018 arising out of Chandwa P. S. Case No. 87 of 2014 corresponding to G. R. No. 620 of 2014 has been disposed of by the learned Court below on 26.02.2020.
Thus, this Criminal Revision Application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the instant Criminal Revision No. 1149 of 2018 is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Sanjay Prasad, J.)
Kamlesh/
Mukesh Yadav
The State of Jharkhand
Ramsewak Baitha
Sanjay Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
