The court dismissed the petition for quashing. Relying on the counsel's submission that an alternative remedy exists, the court disposed of the matter with liberty to avail such remedy.
The petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(Cr.) No. 95 of 2023
Nasiruddin Miyan ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Respondent. --------
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI -----For the Petitioner : Ms Sonal Sodhani, Advocate. : Ms Sreshtha Priya, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Manish Kumar, Sr. S.C.-II.
04/ 01.05.2023 This petition has been filed for quashing of the order dated 11.04.2022, passed in Cr. Rev. No. 03 of 2022, whereby the learned Sessions Judge, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa has affirmed the order dated 10.08.2021, passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Porahat at Chaibasa, in Miscellaneous Criminal Application No. 414 of 2021, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Amitesh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition for quashing is maintainable in view of the existence of alternative remedy under Section 11(5) of the Jharkhand Bovine Animals (Prohibition of Slaughter) Act, 2005?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nasiruddin Miyan
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
