Tabbsum Bano v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought arrest directions in a writ petition. Counsel informed the court that the respondent had already been arrested, leading to the withdrawal of the petition.
Petitioner sought arrest directions in a writ petition. Counsel informed the court that the respondent had already been arrested, leading to the withdrawal of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(Cr.) No. 110 of 2023
Tabbasum Bano ..... … Petitioner
Versus
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
-----For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Binit Chandra, A.C. to A.A.G.-III.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Amitesh/-
Tabbasum Bano
The State of Jharkhand
The Director General of Police, Jharkhand, Ranchi
Superintendent of Police, Lohardaga
Officer-in-Charge, Karu P.S., Lohardaga
I.O. of Mahila P.S., Case No. 02/2020, Lohardaga
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court