Petitioners sought and obtained permission to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition; all pending petitions were dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the instant petition granted; pending petitions dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 86 of 2012
----
Dilip Kumar Pradhan and Another .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand and Another .... Opp. Parties
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioners :- Mr. Govind Rai Karan, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Achinto Sen, Advocate For the O.P.No. :- Mrs. Bakshi Vibha, Advocate ----
4 /13.03.2023 Mr. Govind Rai Karan, the learned counsel on instruction
from Mr. Nagmani Tiwari, the learned counsel who is advocate on record
seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition.
The learned counsels appearing for the State as well as
O.P.No.2 have got no objection for the same.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending petition if any also stands dismissed.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
SI/
Dilip Kumar Pradhan and Another
The State of Jharkhand and Another
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
