The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition upon withdrawal filed by the petitioners whose acquittal by the trial court satisfied them. All parties consented to the withdrawal.
Permission to withdraw the petition was granted and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 220 of 2009
Versus
1.The State of Jharkhand
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioners : Ms. Shipra Shalini, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Vibha Bakshi, Advocate
25/ Dated:-13.03.2023
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition in view of the fact that all the petitioners have been acquitted by the learned trial court.
Learned counsels for the State and O.P. No. 2 have got no objection.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending,
I.A., if any, stands disposed of.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Satyarthi/-
Gurmit Singh Mahal and Ors.
The State of Jharkhand & The State (Govt. of India)
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
