The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the writ petition because the petitioners, upon repeated calls, failed to respond or appear before the court, indicating a loss of interest in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
W.P.(Cr.) No. 85 of 2016
----
1.Mamta Sinha 2.Rajen Kumar .... Petitioners
-- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand and Another .... Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioners :- --For the State :- Mr. M.K.Roy, Advocate For the O.P.No.2 :- Mr. Pradeep Kumar, Advocate ----
8 /06.04.2023 On repeated call, nobody has responded on behalf of the
petitioners.
The learned counsel for the respondent State as well as the
O.P.No.2 are present.
It appears that the petitioners have lost interest in the
matter.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.
Pending petition if any also stand dismissed accordingly.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
SI/
Mamta Sinha
Rajen Kumar
The State of Jharkhand
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
