Writ petition filed to stop illegal encroachment on land. Court noted petitioner lacks legal rights per counter affidavit citing dismissed earlier suits. Dispute involves questions of fact warranting investigation time. No case for interference made out.
Direction to stop illegal encroachment dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(Cr.) No. 62 of 2023
Lal Hargouri Nath Shahdeo ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ..... … Respondents.
Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ..... … Respondents. -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
-----For the Petitioner : None. For the State : Mr. R.K. Shahi, A.C. to S.C. (L&C)-I. ------
05/ 08.11.2023 In spite of repeated calls, the petitioner, who is appearing in person is not present. Mr. R.K. Shahi, learned counsel appearing for the respondents-State is present.
-2-
time to register the FIR and investigation.
petition is dismissed.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Amitesh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere in a case involving disputed questions of fact regarding land encroachment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lalita Kumari Versus Govt. of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.Referred¶10
(2014) 2 SCC 1 · Who else cites this
Lal Hargouri Nath Shahdeo
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
