The petition seeking proper investigation was disposed of as infructuous because the accused had been granted anticipatory bail by a coordinate bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(Cr.) No. 29 of 2022
Shayla Shakra @ Shaela Shakra @ Tamanna ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ..... … Respondents. --------
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
-----For the Petitioners : Mr. Gautam Kumar Pandey, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Amrit Raj Kisku, A.C. to G.A.-V.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Amitesh/-
Shayla Shakra @ Shaela Shakra @ Tamanna
The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
